[J3] [SC22WG5.6678] WG5 ballot on conditionally accepted work items for Fortran 202Y

[Van Snyder]

I'm J3 emeritus and not alternate, so I don't have any ISO credentials
to log in and download the list. And I don't get to vote anyway, but I
would like to see the list and comment on it unofficially.

— Van

On Tue, 2025-04-08 at 11:33 +0100, John Reid via J3 wrote:
> Steve, 
> 
> I have received this but have not voted yet because I am undecided.
> All three items seem reasonable to me and are not big (level 4 on our
> scale), but progress on the accepted items seems slow. Is there a
> summary anywhere of where we are? I found 24-010, but has this been
> updated? 
> 
> I would like to vote for discarding US04, asychronous tasks, our
> biggest item (level 7, likely to need more than 2 years to develop).
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> John. 
> 
> Steve Lionel via J3 wrote:
>  
> > 
> > At the 2024 meeting, three prospective work items were
> > "conditionally accepted". INCITS/Fortran was requested to discuss
> > these at a future meeting to provide direction to WG5 - this
> > happened at the February 2025 meeting in Berkeley. Given the
> > abbreviated (and end-of-week) schedule for the 2025 WG5 meeting, a
> > request was made to provide INCITS/Fortran's guidance and to ballot
> > WG5 members on formally accepting the work items so that
> > development could start earlier.
> > I opened an ISO "working group consultation" ballot for this
> > yesterday, running through May 3. ISO emailed WG5 members about it
> > using a message with subject "ISO Electronic balloting portal -
> > Ballot events". I've since heard from several members who did not
> > receive this notice - if you are a WG5 member (includes J3
> > principals AND alternates), you should be able to access the ballot
> > at Conditionally accepted work items for Fortran 202Y. You will
> > need an ISO login for this - I'm unsure what the process for this
> > is if you don't already have one. As I write this, five sets of
> > votes have been received, so the ballot is working. Keep in mind
> > that at the ISO level we are all "individual experts" and there is
> > not a concept of an organization vote.
> > If you didn't get the email and are a WG5 member, but have trouble
> > accessing the ballot using the link, please email me directly
> > (steve at stevelionel.com - don't reply to the mailing list.)
> > Steve
>  

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20250408/76f6c682/attachment.htm>