[J3] Upcoming gfortran 15 will contain an implementation of unsigned numbers

[Shafran, Aury]

https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/proper-way-to-represent-c-unsigned-char/6154/31

Someone has said unsigned integers are planned for F202Y. I don't know where they got that idea. I'm too nervous to post on forums, but if someone else thinks it would useful to post a correction, I wouldn't be opposed!

Thanks,
Aury

From: J3 <j3-bounces at mailman.j3-fortran.org> On Behalf Of Thomas König via J3
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2024 1:05 PM
To: Jeff Hammond via J3 <j3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org>
Cc: Thomas König <tk at tkoenig.net>
Subject: Re: [J3] Upcoming gfortran 15 will contain an implementation of unsigned numbers

Hi Jeff,
I strongly encourage gfortran to issue a warning when this option is used that the code is not portable.

It is hidden behind a flag which is marked as experimental, that is enough.
I will certainly not issue a warning for using the -funsigned flag :-)

If people find it useful... well, if it should happen to become a
widely-used extension, that could add some impetus towards
adding it for F203X.

Best regards

    Thomas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20241015/858e8028/attachment.htm>