[J3] Question on interps F23/001 and F23/002

[Steve Lionel]

I can't believe I'm saying this, but I'd say it calls out for some 
automation on the J3 web site. Let me think about how this might be done...

Steve

On 2/22/2024 8:34 PM, Malcolm Cohen via J3 wrote:
>
> Hi Reinhold,
>
> Yes, those interps are being worked on. Many interps are stalled 
> needing more work! But I’ve been prioritising getting the standard 
> published.
>
> In its existing “full” form, 006 is extremely unwieldy, so much so 
> that it is a lot of work to produce the whole thing, and then it 
> quickly goes out of date. So I’ve been wanting to reorganise it so 
> that it becomes possible to maintain without excessive work, but have 
> not quite worked out the best solution. I think I’ll probably change 
> it into an indexing document.
>
> I need to find a spare week to organise all this stuff…
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- 
>
> ..............Malcolm Cohen, NAG Oxford/Tokyo.
>
> *From:*J3 <j3-bounces at mailman.j3-fortran.org> *On Behalf Of *Bader, 
> Reinhold via J3
> *Sent:* Friday, February 23, 2024 12:09 AM
> *To:* General J3 interest list <j3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org>
> *Cc:* Bader, Reinhold <Reinhold.Bader at lrz.de>
> *Subject:* [J3] Question on interps F23/001 and F23/002
>
> Dear /interp,
>
> The above interps were started in February last year but seem not to 
> have made any progress since then.
>
> Is there an intention to continue work on these?
>
> The paper entries I see are
>
> https://j3-fortran.org/doc/year/23/23-115.txt
>
> https://j3-fortran.org/doc/year/23/23-116.txt
>
> and the meeting minutes say they were withdrawn for further work.
>
> Also, the standing document 006 seems out of date 
> (https://j3-fortran.org/doc/year/17/17-006.txt)
>
> If it is not maintained any more it might be better to remove it.
>
> Regards
>
> Reinhold
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20240222/b8666920/attachment.htm>