From steve at stevelionel.com Thu Jun 1 14:42:31 2023 From: steve at stevelionel.com (Steve Lionel) Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 10:42:31 -0400 Subject: [J3] [SC22WG5.6444] Manchester meeting, FDIS, WG5 web site Message-ID: <20230601144239.0CA2D3591A3@www.open-std.org> Hello all, We're just over a week away from the Manchester WG5/J3 meeting and I look forward to seeing many of you in person again. For those attending by Zoom, Plenary connection details are at Meeting #230 (June 12-16, 2023) Zoom Connection Info - J3 Work Items (j3-fortran.org) ? For those of you new to this, you log in to the discussion board with the same credentials as you use at j3-fortran.org. If you are a J3/WG5 member and don't have a site login, please send me mail directly (do not reply to the list.) Subgroup connection details will be posted in that thread when available. Please do not post Zoom connection details to the email lists. The current status of the FDIS is that the ISO editor rejected it, citing some of the same complaints as she did for the DIS. Malcolm, Bill Ash and I will be meeting with her next week to discuss this, and it is my hope that we can agree to make some smaller changes and leave major issues such as typeface and font size to the next revision, as it would take months to rework the document (we discussed this at M229.) As ISO has removed public access from "General Information" documents, including many I linked from wg5-fortran.org, the site now has local copies of those documents and the links have been changed to reference them. This is an ongoing issue between SC22 and JTC1 - despite promises for public access years ago, it has not materialized. Steve -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Nathan.Sircombe at arm.com Mon Jun 5 11:31:41 2023 From: Nathan.Sircombe at arm.com (Nathan Sircombe) Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2023 11:31:41 +0000 Subject: [J3] Local arrangements for WG5 in Manchester, 12 - 16 June. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, A quick request for those attending in-person. There will (as is the custom?) be some catering for the meeting (snacks on Tues-Thursday, hopefully a lunch on the Wednesday) . So if you have any allergies or dietary requirements (and you?ve not sent them to me already) please could you let me know ASAP. Cheers, Nathan. From: J3 on behalf of Nathan Sircombe via J3 Date: Tuesday, 23 May 2023 at 5:08 pm To: General J3 interest list , sc22wg5 at open-std.org Cc: Nathan Sircombe Subject: Re: [J3] Local arrangements for WG5 in Manchester, 12 - 16 June. Hi, If you?re attending the meeting in Manchester in person and are interested in any of the social activities below, please let me know. Cheers, Nathan. From: Nathan Sircombe Date: Friday, 12 May 2023 at 5:07 pm To: General J3 interest list , sc22wg5 at open-std.org Subject: Local arrangements for WG5 in Manchester, 12 - 16 June. Hello everybody, The next WG5 meeting, in Manchester UK, is just a month away! The block reservation deadline for room reservations at the nearby Ibis Styles expires in a couple of days, so if you intend to take advantage of this, please make your booking asap if you?ve not already. Hotel details can be found at the end of this message. Don?t forget to register for the meeting on the ISO website here: https://sd.iso.org/meetings/126106 I have made a paper with some details of the local arrangements, which is available here: https://wg5-fortran.org/N2201-N2250/N2214.txt Something that is conspicuously absent from those arrangements is Social Activities! I?d like to get an idea of numbers, and any specific requirements. Provisionally I was thinking? * Sunday afternoon: for those who?ve made it to the City by this point, I thought it might be good to meet up and take a look round Manchester?s Museum of Science and Industry (MoSI) - https://www.scienceandindustrymuseum.org.uk. It?s free to enter, although the ?Power Up? exhibit, for anyone craving some games console nostalgia - https://www.scienceandindustrymuseum.org.uk/whats-on/power-up ? is paid entry. After that, we could go for food. There?s a wide variety in Manchester, but my default suggestion would be the Italian restaurant Salvi?s, not far from MoSI - https://salvismanchester.co.uk/restaurants/salvis-deansgate-square/ * Thursday evening: a social event, all details TBC ? but I?m looking at Society - https://www.societymanchester.com. If you would like to attend either / both of these, please email me directly and let me know by the end of next week (2012-05-19), so I can start to firm-up arrangements. Also, please indicate if anyone will be accompanying you, and if you?ve got any specific dietary requirements. Cheers, Nathan. The hotel details again are? Ibis Styles 96 Portland Street, Manchester M1 4GX. Map: https://w3w.co/venue.mats.waving Rooms available from 2023-06-11: Single occupancy @ ?129 per night bed & breakfast Double occupancy @ ?139 per night bed & breakfast Booking: Email Danielle Fairhurst, the Reservations & Conferences Manager at HA0H5-RE at accor.com State that it?s for the ?Arm Manchester, WG5 meeting?. Danielle will provide details on how to secure the reservation. The rooms will be held until 28 days to go (2023-05-14). Cancellations after this point will be non-refundable. Please note: The Parklife festival is taking place in the city from June 10-11, this impacts room availability for the Saturday before the meeting. I recommend you plan to arrive in the city on the Sunday if possible. If you're considering staying elsewhere and would like some advice, please get in touch. IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Nathan.Sircombe at arm.com Mon Jun 5 11:31:41 2023 From: Nathan.Sircombe at arm.com (Nathan Sircombe) Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2023 11:31:41 +0000 Subject: [J3] [SC22WG5.6445] Local arrangements for WG5 in Manchester, 12 - 16 June. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, A quick request for those attending in-person. There will (as is the custom?) be some catering for the meeting (snacks on Tues-Thursday, hopefully a lunch on the Wednesday) . So if you have any allergies or dietary requirements (and you?ve not sent them to me already) please could you let me know ASAP. Cheers, Nathan. From: J3 on behalf of Nathan Sircombe via J3 Date: Tuesday, 23 May 2023 at 5:08 pm To: General J3 interest list , sc22wg5 at open-std.org Cc: Nathan Sircombe Subject: Re: [J3] Local arrangements for WG5 in Manchester, 12 - 16 June. Hi, If you?re attending the meeting in Manchester in person and are interested in any of the social activities below, please let me know. Cheers, Nathan. From: Nathan Sircombe Date: Friday, 12 May 2023 at 5:07 pm To: General J3 interest list , sc22wg5 at open-std.org Subject: Local arrangements for WG5 in Manchester, 12 - 16 June. Hello everybody, The next WG5 meeting, in Manchester UK, is just a month away! The block reservation deadline for room reservations at the nearby Ibis Styles expires in a couple of days, so if you intend to take advantage of this, please make your booking asap if you?ve not already. Hotel details can be found at the end of this message. Don?t forget to register for the meeting on the ISO website here: https://sd.iso.org/meetings/126106 I have made a paper with some details of the local arrangements, which is available here: https://wg5-fortran.org/N2201-N2250/N2214.txt Something that is conspicuously absent from those arrangements is Social Activities! I?d like to get an idea of numbers, and any specific requirements. Provisionally I was thinking? * Sunday afternoon: for those who?ve made it to the City by this point, I thought it might be good to meet up and take a look round Manchester?s Museum of Science and Industry (MoSI) - https://www.scienceandindustrymuseum.org.uk. It?s free to enter, although the ?Power Up? exhibit, for anyone craving some games console nostalgia - https://www.scienceandindustrymuseum.org.uk/whats-on/power-up ? is paid entry. After that, we could go for food. There?s a wide variety in Manchester, but my default suggestion would be the Italian restaurant Salvi?s, not far from MoSI - https://salvismanchester.co.uk/restaurants/salvis-deansgate-square/ * Thursday evening: a social event, all details TBC ? but I?m looking at Society - https://www.societymanchester.com. If you would like to attend either / both of these, please email me directly and let me know by the end of next week (2012-05-19), so I can start to firm-up arrangements. Also, please indicate if anyone will be accompanying you, and if you?ve got any specific dietary requirements. Cheers, Nathan. The hotel details again are? Ibis Styles 96 Portland Street, Manchester M1 4GX. Map: https://w3w.co/venue.mats.waving Rooms available from 2023-06-11: Single occupancy @ ?129 per night bed & breakfast Double occupancy @ ?139 per night bed & breakfast Booking: Email Danielle Fairhurst, the Reservations & Conferences Manager at HA0H5-RE at accor.com State that it?s for the ?Arm Manchester, WG5 meeting?. Danielle will provide details on how to secure the reservation. The rooms will be held until 28 days to go (2023-05-14). Cancellations after this point will be non-refundable. Please note: The Parklife festival is taking place in the city from June 10-11, this impacts room availability for the Saturday before the meeting. I recommend you plan to arrive in the city on the Sunday if possible. If you're considering staying elsewhere and would like some advice, please get in touch. IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From steve at stevelionel.com Thu Jun 8 00:08:04 2023 From: steve at stevelionel.com (Steve Lionel) Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 20:08:04 -0400 Subject: [J3] [SC22WG5.6447] WG23 resolution Message-ID: <20230608000807.8ACAE3591CE@www.open-std.org> Hello all, Those of you who have been with us for a while will know that there's been an ongoing project to create a "Fortran annex" to a WG23 document relating to programming language vulnerabilities. Dan Nagle championed this for many years, and since then, several of us, including John Reid, Tom Clune and myself, along with others, have been working with WG23 Convenor Stephen Michell to finish this. We're essentially done, with just some formatting and minor issues to complete. WG23 is requesting that WG5 approve the latest draft, which I have uploaded as https://wg5-fortran.org/ARCHIVE/WG23-N1301-20230605.pdf , as "essentially complete" and to give permission to WG23 to complete the document and submit it for ballot as an international standard. I would like this to be one of the resolutions for the Manchester meeting. Please let me know if you have questions. Steve From danlnagle at mac.com Thu Jun 8 21:18:21 2023 From: danlnagle at mac.com (Dan Nagle) Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 15:18:21 -0600 Subject: [J3] [SC22WG5.6447] WG23 resolution In-Reply-To: <20230608000807.8ACAE3591CE@www.open-std.org> References: <20230608000807.8ACAE3591CE@www.open-std.org> Message-ID: <592C3835-F065-4E77-AE35-C8B24E3EC9B4@mac.com> Hi, I have read the draft WG23 N1301. Kudos to those who persevered to completion. My apologies for not carrying the ball further, but now the goal line is realistically in reach. A couple of comments, of course! In 6.2.2 and other places, the out_of_range() intrinsic is not mentioned. I would have thought it's worthy of a good brag. In 6.3.2, left-most is mentioned, but not right-most. I couldn't deduce a reason from the surrounding text. In 6.6.1, iostat is always >0 for errors, no? The <0 values are "informative" as end-of-record or end-of-file or similar. If my observations are not reproducible, please ignore them. My sincere congratulations to those who finished the job, and did so so well. :-) > On Jun 7, 2023, at 18:08, Steve Lionel via J3 wrote: > > Hello all, > > Those of you who have been with us for a while will know that there's been an ongoing project to create a "Fortran annex" to a WG23 document relating to programming language vulnerabilities. Dan Nagle championed this for many years, and since then, several of us, including John Reid, Tom Clune and myself, along with others, have been working with WG23 Convenor Stephen Michell to finish this. We're essentially done, with just some formatting and minor issues to complete. > > WG23 is requesting that WG5 approve the latest draft, which I have uploaded as https://wg5-fortran.org/ARCHIVE/WG23-N1301-20230605.pdf , as "essentially complete" and to give permission to WG23 to complete the document and submit it for ballot as an international standard. I would like this to be one of the resolutions for the Manchester meeting. > > Please let me know if you have questions. > > Steve > -- Cheers! Dan Nagle From reubendb at ornl.gov Mon Jun 12 12:01:20 2023 From: reubendb at ornl.gov (Reuben D. Budiardja) Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 08:01:20 -0400 Subject: [J3] Generics Tutorial at WG5/J3 Joint Meeting This Week Message-ID: <04635866-1d62-c3e4-0f8e-49b2f9f89b65@ornl.gov> We plan to have Generics tutorial on Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday this week at 10:45am UK time (GMT+1). Best, Reuben From jehammond at nvidia.com Wed Jun 14 15:47:47 2023 From: jehammond at nvidia.com (Jeff Hammond) Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 15:47:47 +0000 Subject: [J3] [SC22WG5.6448] 23-196 Message-ID: I like this paper and agree with the choice of %% syntax as well as prohibiting the bypass of use-only. When I employ ?use, only?, I am hoping that the compiler with be able to reduce compile and link-time because the other symbols are not visible, and %% bypass would break that. I am sharing my comments here because I don?t attend the relevant subgroup. Jeff -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ondrej at certik.us Wed Jun 14 18:42:57 2023 From: ondrej at certik.us (=?UTF-8?Q?Ond=C5=99ej_=C4=8Cert=C3=ADk?=) Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 12:42:57 -0600 Subject: [J3] [SC22WG5.6448] 23-196 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <31de89c2-b43c-4bf9-852a-c345f19a2621@app.fastmail.com> Hi, Here is the paper: https://j3-fortran.org/doc/year/23/23-196.txt I think the ideas and the approach there are reasonable. The main use case that seems to be missing is where you want to import the module, but not have any symbols from it imported, only those that you access via `m1%%f`. Example: Subroutine s Use m1, as_module: ! we have to find a better syntax ... m1%%f = 999 ! Allowed f = 999 ! Not allowed This use case is equivalent to Python's: import m1 m1.f = 999 # Allowed f = 999 # Not allowed It's precisely this use case that has been frequently requested. Ondrej On Wed, Jun 14, 2023, at 9:47 AM, Jeff Hammond via J3 wrote: > I like this paper and agree with the choice of %% syntax as well as > prohibiting the bypass of use-only. When I employ ?use, only?, I am > hoping that the compiler with be able to reduce compile and link-time > because the other symbols are not visible, and %% bypass would break > that. > > I am sharing my comments here because I don?t attend the relevant subgroup. > > Jeff From steve at stevelionel.com Wed Jun 14 18:49:53 2023 From: steve at stevelionel.com (Steve Lionel) Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 19:49:53 +0100 Subject: [J3] [SC22WG5.6448] 23-196 In-Reply-To: <31de89c2-b43c-4bf9-852a-c345f19a2621@app.fastmail.com> References: <31de89c2-b43c-4bf9-852a-c345f19a2621@app.fastmail.com> Message-ID: On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 7:43?PM Ond?ej ?ert?k via J3 < j3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org> wrote: > > I think the ideas and the approach there are reasonable. The main use case > that seems to be missing is where you want to import the module, but not > have any symbols from it imported, only those that you access via `m1%%f`. > Our thought on that is you can say: import modame, only: That is, an empty only clause. This makes the module visible but does not bring in any of its symbols. This is allowed by current syntax. Then you can use the new feature to reference specific entities. Steve -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ondrej at certik.us Wed Jun 14 18:42:57 2023 From: ondrej at certik.us (=?UTF-8?Q?Ond=C5=99ej_=C4=8Cert=C3=ADk?=) Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 12:42:57 -0600 Subject: [J3] [SC22WG5.6449] 23-196 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20230614185052.BBE993591D9@www.open-std.org> Hi, Here is the paper: https://j3-fortran.org/doc/year/23/23-196.txt I think the ideas and the approach there are reasonable. The main use case that seems to be missing is where you want to import the module, but not have any symbols from it imported, only those that you access via `m1%%f`. Example: Subroutine s Use m1, as_module: ! we have to find a better syntax ... m1%%f = 999 ! Allowed f = 999 ! Not allowed This use case is equivalent to Python's: import m1 m1.f = 999 # Allowed f = 999 # Not allowed It's precisely this use case that has been frequently requested. Ondrej On Wed, Jun 14, 2023, at 9:47 AM, Jeff Hammond via J3 wrote: > I like this paper and agree with the choice of %% syntax as well as > prohibiting the bypass of use-only. When I employ ?use, only?, I am > hoping that the compiler with be able to reduce compile and link-time > because the other symbols are not visible, and %% bypass would break > that. > > I am sharing my comments here because I don?t attend the relevant subgroup. > > Jeff From ondrej at certik.us Wed Jun 14 18:53:50 2023 From: ondrej at certik.us (=?UTF-8?Q?Ond=C5=99ej_=C4=8Cert=C3=ADk?=) Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 12:53:50 -0600 Subject: [J3] [SC22WG5.6448] 23-196 In-Reply-To: References: <31de89c2-b43c-4bf9-852a-c345f19a2621@app.fastmail.com> Message-ID: On Wed, Jun 14, 2023, at 12:49 PM, Steve Lionel via J3 wrote: > On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 7:43?PM Ond?ej ?ert?k via J3 > wrote: >> >> I think the ideas and the approach there are reasonable. The main use case that seems to be missing is where you want to import the module, but not have any symbols from it imported, only those that you access via `m1%%f`. > > Our thought on that is you can say: > > import modame, only: > > That is, an empty only clause. This makes the module visible but does > not bring in any of its symbols. This is allowed by current syntax. > Then you can use the new feature to reference specific entities. Perfect, this would work! Ondrej From steve at stevelionel.com Wed Jun 14 18:56:34 2023 From: steve at stevelionel.com (Steve Lionel) Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 19:56:34 +0100 Subject: [J3] [SC22WG5.6448] 23-196 In-Reply-To: References: <31de89c2-b43c-4bf9-852a-c345f19a2621@app.fastmail.com> Message-ID: Of course, I meant USE, not IMPORT... Steve On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 7:54?PM Ond?ej ?ert?k wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 14, 2023, at 12:49 PM, Steve Lionel via J3 wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 7:43?PM Ond?ej ?ert?k via J3 > > wrote: > >> > >> I think the ideas and the approach there are reasonable. The main use > case that seems to be missing is where you want to import the module, but > not have any symbols from it imported, only those that you access via > `m1%%f`. > > > > Our thought on that is you can say: > > > > import modame, only: > > > > That is, an empty only clause. This makes the module visible but does > > not bring in any of its symbols. This is allowed by current syntax. > > Then you can use the new feature to reference specific entities. > > Perfect, this would work! > > Ondrej > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From van.snyder at sbcglobal.net Wed Jun 14 22:34:59 2023 From: van.snyder at sbcglobal.net (Van Snyder) Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 15:34:59 -0700 Subject: [J3] [SC22WG5.6448] 23-196 In-Reply-To: <31de89c2-b43c-4bf9-852a-c345f19a2621@app.fastmail.com> References: <31de89c2-b43c-4bf9-852a-c345f19a2621@app.fastmail.com> Message-ID: On Wed, 2023-06-14 at 12:42 -0600, Ond?ej ?ert?k via J3 wrote: > This use case is equivalent to Python's: > import m1m1.f = 999 # Allowedf = 999 # Not allowed And Modula-2. I asked for this in 1986. In Modula-2, if you use "IMPORT M" you have to qualify every reference, as M.foo. If you use "FROM M IMPORT foo" you can use just "foo". The latter is similar to "USE, ONLY." As Ond?ej remarks, the former is (still) lacking in Fortran. I like that dichotomy because by looking at a single file (actually, two in Modula-2, the interface and implementation modules), I can know where every identifier comes from without using grep. Is it too late to make host association work for module names, so that one percent sign would be enough? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From john.reid at stfc.ac.uk Fri Jun 16 09:20:34 2023 From: john.reid at stfc.ac.uk (John Reid - STFC UKRI) Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 09:20:34 +0000 Subject: [J3] [SC22WG5.6450] Draft minutes Message-ID: Here are draft minutes of the WG5 meeting. Comments, please. In particular, is the list of participants correct? John. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG5 N2223-2 Minutes of (Hybrid) Meeting of ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG5 Hosted by BSI, the UK Member Body for JTC1/SC22 Held at Arm Ltd., 11 Portland Street, Manchester, M1 3HU, UK June 12-16, 2023. List of Participants: Steve Lionel (USA) WG5 convenor Reinhold Bader (Germany) Reuben Budiardja (USA) Kiran Chandramohan (UK) Daniel Chen (Canada) Tom Clune (USA) Malcolm Cohen (UK) Brian Cornille (USA) Jeff Hammond (USA) Magne Haveraaen (Norway) Paul Henning (USA) Hidetoshi Iwashita (Japan) Gary Klimowicz (USA) Mark LeAir (USA) Bill Long (USA) Raghu Maddhipatla (USA) Lorri Menard (USA) David Muxworthy (UK) Lucas Pettey (USA) John Reid (UK) Brad Richardson (USA) Damian Rouson (USA) Nathan Sircombe (UK) Jon Steidel (USA) Masayuki Takata (Japan) Notes: 1. This was a joint meeting of SC22/WG5 and INCITS/Fortran. These minutes record only the parts of the meeting in WG5 mode. 2. WG5 papers are referenced as Nnnnn. They are available from https://wg5-fortran.org/documents.html 3. INCITS/Fortran meeting papers are referenced as J3/22-nnn. They are available from https://j3-fortran.org/ 1. Opening of the Meeting The meeting opened at 09:05 on Monday, June 12, 2023 2. Opening business 2.1 Introductory remarks from the Convenor The convenor welcomed both local (in-person) and remote participants to the meeting. 2.2 Reminder of the ISO Code of Conduct The convenor reminded participants of the ISO Code of Ethics and Conduct, available at https://www.iso.org/files/live/sites/isoorg/files/store/en/PUB100011.pdf 2.3 Welcome from the Host Nathan Sircombe welcomed local participants to ARM Office in Manchester. 2.4 Local arrangements Nathan Sircombe explained the arrangments for the meeting. 2.5 Appointments for this meeting Drafting Committee: David Muxworthy (chair), Gary Klimowicz, Hidetoshi Iwashita, Reinhold Bader, Daniel Chen. Librarian: Steve Lionel. Secretary: John Reid. 2.6 Adoption of the Agenda N2215 The agenda was adopted. 3. Matters arising from the Minutes of the 2022 meeting (N2202) Steve Lionel reported that the FDIS was not accepted by the ISO editor because of its use of a smaller font than required and because of its use of a smaller font for deprecated features. At a recent meeting of the ISO editor with Steve Lionel and Malcolm Cohen, it was agreed that a larger font be used for the next standard and another method be used to denote deprecated features. Steve and Malcolm requested that no change fonts be made for the 2023 standard and a decision was promised by 16 June. Damian Rouson confirmed his offer to host the 2024 meeting at Berkeley Labs. 4. Status of 2022 Resolutions (N2200) Corrigendum 2 has been published. David Muxworthy remarked that ISO had made changes, but the document was still correct. However, BSI had manually incorporated the changes into a new document labelled Fortran 2023 and made errors. 5. Reports 5.1 SC22 Matters (Convenor) Steve Lionel reported that open access to WG5 documents is now provided by links to his website. It is no longer available from ISO despite the promise that it should continue. INCITS now has a rule that no meetings be joint without permission but we have permission for this meeting to be joint with WG5 and this is expected for future meetings. It is clearly needed. Drafts of standards up to FDIS may now have paragraph and line numbers. WG5 agrees that line numbers should be excluded from the final standard because they change with translation but requests Steve Lionel to ask SC22 to seek approval for paragraph numbers to be allowed. 5.2 National Activity Reports Canada: No national activity was reported. Germany: No national activity was reported. Japan: Masayuki Takata reported that the translation of Fortran 2018 into Japanese was published in March. UK: No national activity was reported. USA: See 5.3. 5.3 Report from Primary Development Body (INCITS/Fortran Chair) INCITS/Fortran continues to work actively on all aspects of the Fortran standard. 5.4 Reports from other Development Bodies (Editors/Heads) Steve Lionel, Tom Clune, and John Reid have been meeting every 2 weeks on zoom with Stephen Michell and Erhard Ploedereder of WG23 constructing a supplementary standard on vulnerabilities in Fortran. The latest draft is nearly ready for submission. 5.5 Liaison Reports: Liaison reports were presented under INCITS/Fortran business. 6. WG5 Business and Strategic Plans 6.1 Goals for 2023-2025 The intention remains that the next revision of the standard be published before the end of 2028. The target dates shown in N2200 were agreed. 7. Create initial work item list for the next revision ("202Y") The list of items in N2222 was agreed. 8. Closing Business 8.1 Future meetings The next meeting will be in Berkeley, Ca, USA, hosted by Damian Rouson. The dates are expected to be 24-28 June 2023 and are subject to confirmation. A preliminary offer to host the 2025 in Helsinki has been made by Jeff Hammond. 8.2 Any other business There was no other business. 9. Adoption of Resolutions The resolutions in N2023 were all adopted unanimously. 10. Adjournment The meeting was closed at 10:07, June 16, 2023. From Reinhold.Bader at lrz.de Fri Jun 16 09:54:56 2023 From: Reinhold.Bader at lrz.de (Bader, Reinhold) Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 09:54:56 +0000 Subject: [J3] [SC22WG5.6451] AW: Draft minutes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20230616100012.2BC233591C0@www.open-std.org> John, in section 9, the resolution document name needs to be updated to N2219. Was there already feedback from ISO as promised in 3? If yes, perhaps a remark on this can be added. Cheers, Reinhold Von: owner-sc22wg5 at open-std.org Im Auftrag von John Reid - STFC UKRI Gesendet: Freitag, 16. Juni 2023 11:21 An: WG5 List Betreff: [SC22WG5.6450] Draft minutes Here are draft minutes of the WG5 meeting. Comments, please. In particular, is the list of participants correct? John. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From steve at stevelionel.com Fri Jun 16 10:06:26 2023 From: steve at stevelionel.com (Steve Lionel) Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 11:06:26 +0100 Subject: [J3] [SC22WG5.6452] AW: Draft minutes In-Reply-To: <20230616100012.2BC233591C0@www.open-std.org> References: <20230616100012.2BC233591C0@www.open-std.org> Message-ID: <20230616100639.711F13591E4@www.open-std.org> Sadly, no response yet from ISO. Steve On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 11:00?AM Bader, Reinhold via J3 < j3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org> wrote: > John, > > > > in section 9, the resolution document name needs to be updated to N2219. > > > > Was there already feedback from ISO as promised in 3? If yes, perhaps a > remark on this can be added. > > > > Cheers, > > Reinhold > > > > *Von:* owner-sc22wg5 at open-std.org *Im > Auftrag von *John Reid - STFC UKRI > *Gesendet:* Freitag, 16. Juni 2023 11:21 > *An:* WG5 List > *Betreff:* [SC22WG5.6450] Draft minutes > > > > Here are draft minutes of the WG5 meeting. Comments, please. In > particular, is the list of participants correct? > > > > John. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gak at dancingbear.dev Fri Jun 16 17:54:51 2023 From: gak at dancingbear.dev (Gary Klimowicz) Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 10:54:51 -0700 Subject: [J3] [SC22WG5.6450] Draft minutes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <21AF8C68-7193-4D5C-8FC9-1C2BF389E564@dancingbear.dev> Hi, John. I believe Aleksander Donev (US) attended briefly, at least on Thursday. I didn't see him in the attendee list. Aleks is one of my alternates. Thanks for doing the minutes. Gary > On Jun 16, 2023, at 02:20, John Reid - STFC UKRI via J3 wrote: > > Here are draft minutes of the WG5 meeting. Comments, please. In particular, is the list of participants correct? > > John. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gak at dancingbear.dev Fri Jun 16 17:54:51 2023 From: gak at dancingbear.dev (Gary Klimowicz) Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 10:54:51 -0700 Subject: [J3] [SC22WG5.6453] Draft minutes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20230616180122.37DEB3591E7@www.open-std.org> Hi, John. I believe Aleksander Donev (US) attended briefly, at least on Thursday. I didn't see him in the attendee list. Aleks is one of my alternates. Thanks for doing the minutes. Gary > On Jun 16, 2023, at 02:20, John Reid - STFC UKRI via J3 wrote: > > Here are draft minutes of the WG5 meeting. Comments, please. In particular, is the list of participants correct? > > John. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From richard at bleikamp.net Fri Jun 16 18:15:58 2023 From: richard at bleikamp.net (Richard Bleikamp) Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 14:15:58 -0400 Subject: [J3] [SC22WG5.6450] Draft minutes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <956b35e4-5dc1-f5f7-dde3-9306a003d726@bleikamp.net> Hi John, Should the "Future meeting" in Berkeley be in 2024? rich On 6/16/2023 5:20 AM, John Reid - STFC UKRI via J3 wrote: > Here are draft minutes of the WG5 meeting. Comments, please. In > particular, is the list of participants correct? > > John. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gak at dancingbear.dev Fri Jun 16 18:19:59 2023 From: gak at dancingbear.dev (Gary Klimowicz) Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 11:19:59 -0700 Subject: [J3] [SC22WG5.6453] Draft minutes In-Reply-To: References: <20230616180122.37DEB3591E7@www.open-std.org> Message-ID: Thanks, Bill. Aleks has been too polite to correct me. :-) > On Jun 16, 2023, at 11:18, Long, Bill F wrote: > > Yes, I saw him on the Zoom screen. The correct spelling of his first name is Aleksandar (second to last letter is an "a"). > > Cheer, > Bill > > From: J3 on behalf of Gary Klimowicz via J3 > Sent: Friday, June 16, 2023 12:54 PM > To: General J3 interest list > Cc: Gary Klimowicz ; WG5 List > Subject: [J3] [SC22WG5.6453] Draft minutes > > Hi, John. > > I believe Aleksander Donev (US) attended briefly, at least on Thursday. I didn't see him in the attendee list. Aleks is one of my alternates. > > Thanks for doing the minutes. > > Gary > > >> On Jun 16, 2023, at 02:20, John Reid - STFC UKRI via J3 wrote: >> >> Here are draft minutes of the WG5 meeting. Comments, please. In particular, is the list of participants correct? >> >> John. >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gak at dancingbear.dev Fri Jun 16 18:19:59 2023 From: gak at dancingbear.dev (Gary Klimowicz) Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 11:19:59 -0700 Subject: [J3] [SC22WG5.6454] Draft minutes In-Reply-To: References: <20230616180122.37DEB3591E7@www.open-std.org> Message-ID: <20230616182033.D61523591E8@www.open-std.org> Thanks, Bill. Aleks has been too polite to correct me. :-) > On Jun 16, 2023, at 11:18, Long, Bill F wrote: > > Yes, I saw him on the Zoom screen. The correct spelling of his first name is Aleksandar (second to last letter is an "a"). > > Cheer, > Bill > > From: J3 on behalf of Gary Klimowicz via J3 > Sent: Friday, June 16, 2023 12:54 PM > To: General J3 interest list > Cc: Gary Klimowicz ; WG5 List > Subject: [J3] [SC22WG5.6453] Draft minutes > > Hi, John. > > I believe Aleksander Donev (US) attended briefly, at least on Thursday. I didn't see him in the attendee list. Aleks is one of my alternates. > > Thanks for doing the minutes. > > Gary > > >> On Jun 16, 2023, at 02:20, John Reid - STFC UKRI via J3 wrote: >> >> Here are draft minutes of the WG5 meeting. Comments, please. In particular, is the list of participants correct? >> >> John. >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From john.reid at stfc.ac.uk Fri Jun 16 20:32:19 2023 From: john.reid at stfc.ac.uk (John Reid - STFC UKRI) Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 20:32:19 +0000 Subject: [J3] [SC22WG5.6454] Draft minutes In-Reply-To: <20230616182033.D61523591E8@www.open-std.org> References: <20230616180122.37DEB3591E7@www.open-std.org> <20230616182033.D61523591E8@www.open-std.org> Message-ID: I have added him. Cheers, John. ________________________________ From: J3 on behalf of Gary Klimowicz via J3 Sent: 16 June 2023 19:19 To: Long, Bill F Cc: Gary Klimowicz ; General J3 interest list ; WG5 List Subject: [J3] [SC22WG5.6454] Draft minutes Thanks, Bill. Aleks has been too polite to correct me. :-) On Jun 16, 2023, at 11:18, Long, Bill F wrote: Yes, I saw him on the Zoom screen. The correct spelling of his first name is Aleksandar (second to last letter is an "a"). Cheer, Bill ________________________________ From: J3 on behalf of Gary Klimowicz via J3 Sent: Friday, June 16, 2023 12:54 PM To: General J3 interest list Cc: Gary Klimowicz ; WG5 List Subject: [J3] [SC22WG5.6453] Draft minutes Hi, John. I believe Aleksander Donev (US) attended briefly, at least on Thursday. I didn't see him in the attendee list. Aleks is one of my alternates. Thanks for doing the minutes. Gary On Jun 16, 2023, at 02:20, John Reid - STFC UKRI via J3 wrote: Here are draft minutes of the WG5 meeting. Comments, please. In particular, is the list of participants correct? John. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From john.reid at stfc.ac.uk Fri Jun 16 20:32:19 2023 From: john.reid at stfc.ac.uk (John Reid - STFC UKRI) Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 20:32:19 +0000 Subject: [J3] [SC22WG5.6456] Draft minutes In-Reply-To: <20230616182033.D61523591E8@www.open-std.org> References: <20230616180122.37DEB3591E7@www.open-std.org> <20230616182033.D61523591E8@www.open-std.org> Message-ID: I have added him. Cheers, John. ________________________________ From: J3 on behalf of Gary Klimowicz via J3 Sent: 16 June 2023 19:19 To: Long, Bill F Cc: Gary Klimowicz ; General J3 interest list ; WG5 List Subject: [J3] [SC22WG5.6454] Draft minutes Thanks, Bill. Aleks has been too polite to correct me. :-) On Jun 16, 2023, at 11:18, Long, Bill F wrote: Yes, I saw him on the Zoom screen. The correct spelling of his first name is Aleksandar (second to last letter is an "a"). Cheer, Bill ________________________________ From: J3 on behalf of Gary Klimowicz via J3 Sent: Friday, June 16, 2023 12:54 PM To: General J3 interest list Cc: Gary Klimowicz ; WG5 List Subject: [J3] [SC22WG5.6453] Draft minutes Hi, John. I believe Aleksander Donev (US) attended briefly, at least on Thursday. I didn't see him in the attendee list. Aleks is one of my alternates. Thanks for doing the minutes. Gary On Jun 16, 2023, at 02:20, John Reid - STFC UKRI via J3 wrote: Here are draft minutes of the WG5 meeting. Comments, please. In particular, is the list of participants correct? John. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From steve at stevelionel.com Wed Jun 21 23:04:00 2023 From: steve at stevelionel.com (Steve Lionel) Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 19:04:00 -0400 Subject: [J3] [SC22WG5.6460] This time for sure! Message-ID: <20230621230404.91EDD3591D8@www.open-std.org> The revised F2023 FDIS, with changes requested by ISO and a waiver for the font and font sizes (received yesterday), has been submitted to ISO. There is an eight-week voting period (though I imagine the ISO editor will take a look first.) If everything goes well, it may publish in September or October. Thanks to everyone who helped make this happen, especially Malcolm, who put in extraordinary effort in response to the ISO editor's comments. Steve From gak at dancingbear.dev Thu Jun 22 04:22:04 2023 From: gak at dancingbear.dev (Gary Klimowicz) Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 21:22:04 -0700 Subject: [J3] [SC22WG5.6460] This time for sure! In-Reply-To: <20230621230404.91EDD3591D8@www.open-std.org> References: <20230621230404.91EDD3591D8@www.open-std.org> Message-ID: <29B8C345-9A63-42F2-B5DB-9EEF31BB402F@dancingbear.dev> On Jun 21, 2023, at 16:04, Steve Lionel via J3 wrote: > > The revised F2023 FDIS, with changes requested by ISO and a waiver for the font and font sizes (received yesterday), has been submitted to ISO. There is an eight-week voting period (though I imagine the ISO editor will take a look first.) If everything goes well, it may publish in September or October. > > Thanks to everyone who helped make this happen, especially Malcolm, who put in extraordinary effort in response to the ISO editor's comments. This is great news, Steve! Thanks to Malcolm for all his work, and to you for pushing this through. From gak at dancingbear.dev Thu Jun 22 04:22:04 2023 From: gak at dancingbear.dev (Gary Klimowicz) Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 21:22:04 -0700 Subject: [J3] [SC22WG5.6461] This time for sure! In-Reply-To: <20230621230404.91EDD3591D8@www.open-std.org> References: <20230621230404.91EDD3591D8@www.open-std.org> Message-ID: <20230622043153.75DCF3591E4@www.open-std.org> On Jun 21, 2023, at 16:04, Steve Lionel via J3 wrote: > > The revised F2023 FDIS, with changes requested by ISO and a waiver for the font and font sizes (received yesterday), has been submitted to ISO. There is an eight-week voting period (though I imagine the ISO editor will take a look first.) If everything goes well, it may publish in September or October. > > Thanks to everyone who helped make this happen, especially Malcolm, who put in extraordinary effort in response to the ISO editor's comments. This is great news, Steve! Thanks to Malcolm for all his work, and to you for pushing this through. From reubendb at ornl.gov Thu Jun 22 14:27:27 2023 From: reubendb at ornl.gov (Reuben D. Budiardja) Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 10:27:27 -0400 Subject: [J3] [EXTERNAL] [SC22WG5.6461] This time for sure! In-Reply-To: <20230622043153.75DCF3591E4@www.open-std.org> References: <20230621230404.91EDD3591D8@www.open-std.org> <20230622043153.75DCF3591E4@www.open-std.org> Message-ID: <30d5ea6d-5b7d-099f-c435-8ff1b6261a7c@ornl.gov> Great news indeed. Thank you to Malcolm and Steve for pushing this. And thank you for everyone's hard work. We had a very productive meeting last week. Best, Reuben On 6/22/23 00:22, Gary Klimowicz via J3 wrote: > On Jun 21, 2023, at 16:04, Steve Lionel via J3 wrote: >> >> The revised F2023 FDIS, with changes requested by ISO and a waiver for the font and font sizes (received yesterday), has been submitted to ISO. There is an eight-week voting period (though I imagine the ISO editor will take a look first.) If everything goes well, it may publish in September or October. >> >> Thanks to everyone who helped make this happen, especially Malcolm, who put in extraordinary effort in response to the ISO editor's comments. > > This is great news, Steve! Thanks to Malcolm for all his work, and to you for pushing this through. > From reubendb at ornl.gov Thu Jun 22 14:27:27 2023 From: reubendb at ornl.gov (Reuben D. Budiardja) Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 10:27:27 -0400 Subject: [J3] [SC22WG5.6462] [EXTERNAL] This time for sure! In-Reply-To: <20230622043153.75DCF3591E4@www.open-std.org> References: <20230621230404.91EDD3591D8@www.open-std.org> <20230622043153.75DCF3591E4@www.open-std.org> Message-ID: <20230622144215.0625F3591EC@www.open-std.org> Great news indeed. Thank you to Malcolm and Steve for pushing this. And thank you for everyone's hard work. We had a very productive meeting last week. Best, Reuben On 6/22/23 00:22, Gary Klimowicz via J3 wrote: > On Jun 21, 2023, at 16:04, Steve Lionel via J3 wrote: >> >> The revised F2023 FDIS, with changes requested by ISO and a waiver for the font and font sizes (received yesterday), has been submitted to ISO. There is an eight-week voting period (though I imagine the ISO editor will take a look first.) If everything goes well, it may publish in September or October. >> >> Thanks to everyone who helped make this happen, especially Malcolm, who put in extraordinary effort in response to the ISO editor's comments. > > This is great news, Steve! Thanks to Malcolm for all his work, and to you for pushing this through. >