[J3] New intrinsic XXX_PREFIX and XXX_SUFFIX procedures
Brad Richardson
everythingfunctional at protonmail.com
Fri Jan 27 03:48:45 UTC 2023
Hi Van,
Ok, I see. That's certainly an interesting idea, but I think I'd rather just introduce specialized scan functions. I.e. SCAN_SUM. The enumerator thing has no precedent in Fortran (AFAIK).
Regards,
Brad
On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 17:06 -0800, Van Snyder wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 23:52 +0000, Brad Richardson via J3 wrote:
>
>> Hi Van,
>>
>> I'm not quite sure I understand the use case your suggesting. What would it mean to provide an enumerator as an OPERATION? Can you provide an example?
>
> Assume there is an enumeration type SCAN_OPERATIONS in ISO_Fortran-Env, and one of the enumerators is SCAN_SUM. then you'd invoke the SCAN instrinsic using
>
> SCAN ( ARRAY, SCAN_SUM )
>
> As I mentioned in reply to Tom's question, if the OPERATION isn't a function, it ought to be an enumerator, i.e., a constant, so the processor knows which scan to do at compile time. If you want it to be a run-time selection, use the form in which OPERATION is a function, and put your decision inside of it.
>
> Alternatively, one could allow the OPERATION to be a variable of the enumeration type, with a note that this might be less efficient because the processor doesn't know which operation to do at compile time. It's kine of like the processor optimizing sqrt(2.0) when it sees that, instead of
>
> x = 2.0
> print *, sqrt(x)
>
>> Regards,
>> Brad
>>
>> On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 10:45 -0800, Van Snyder via J3 wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 16:52 +0000, Brad Richardson via J3 wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've been pondering this more, and I think the way I'd like to propose
>>>> this is as a single new intrinsic. I think it could in theory be named
>>>> SCAN, as the interface would be fully distinguishable from the existing
>>>> SCAN intrinsic for character set membership search. The interface would
>>>> be:
>>>>
>>>> SCAN(ARRAY, OPERATION[, IDENTITY, DIM, MASK, SEGMENT, EXCLUSIVE,
>>>> REVERSED, ORDERED])
>>>
>>> There should be two varieties of OPERATION. One would be an enumerator of an enumeration type defined in ISO_Fortran_Env. The other would be a two-argument function provided by the user.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20230127/56728f0e/attachment.htm>
More information about the J3
mailing list