[J3] [EXTERNAL] [BULK] Re: Consistency in conversion functions

[Vipul Parekh]

On Tue, Apr 4, 2023, 7:57 PM Damian Rouson via J3 <j3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org>
wrote:

> ... I would support a proposal to add INTEGER() and COMPLEX() with
> equivalent meanings to INT() and CMPLX(), respectively
>

Hi Damian,

Thank you for taking a clear stance on the matter on its (!!) own obvious
merit rather than getting into the usual nonsensical deflection of costs vs
benefits, something that absolutely NO ONE in this email chain quite
understands, least of all the vendor reps.

Regards,
Vipul Parekh

>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20230405/9e60ec47/attachment.htm>