[J3] [EXTERNAL] [BULK] Re: Consistency in conversion functions

Vipul Parekh parekhvs at gmail.com
Wed Apr 5 04:32:07 UTC 2023

On Tue, Apr 4, 2023, 7:57 PM Damian Rouson via J3 <j3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org>

> ... I would support a proposal to add INTEGER() and COMPLEX() with
> equivalent meanings to INT() and CMPLX(), respectively

Hi Damian,

Thank you for taking a clear stance on the matter on its (!!) own obvious
merit rather than getting into the usual nonsensical deflection of costs vs
benefits, something that absolutely NO ONE in this email chain quite
understands, least of all the vendor reps.

Vipul Parekh

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20230405/9e60ec47/attachment.htm>

More information about the J3 mailing list