[J3] [EXTERNAL] Re: Question about "Ambiguous interfaces in generic interface"
Clune, Thomas L. (GSFC-6101)
thomas.l.clune at nasa.gov
Fri Oct 7 14:36:20 UTC 2022
I agree with Brad’s analysis, and my NAG compiler generates the error:
Error: overload.F90, line 20: Ambiguous specific names MPI_BCAST_F08TS and MPI_BCAST_F08 in generic MPI_BCAST
This is the latest patch (7013) so it is possible earlier patches did not complain?
From: J3 <j3-bounces at mailman.j3-fortran.org> on behalf of j3 <j3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org>
Reply-To: j3 <j3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org>
Date: Friday, October 7, 2022 at 9:43 AM
To: j3 <j3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org>
Cc: Steve Lionel <steve at stevelionel.com>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [J3] Question about "Ambiguous interfaces in generic interface"
On 10/7/2022 9:36 AM, Jeff Hammond via J3 wrote:
I am trying to understand why GCC Fortran (12.2) rejects this code, whereas Cray and Intel are happy with it (and NVHPC is too, if I use something other than type(*)).
FWIW, NAG Fortran 7.1 is also happy with this code.
D:\Projects>nagfor -c -f2018 t.f90
NAG Fortran Compiler Release 7.1(Hanzomon) Build 7108
Warning: t.f90, line 14: Unused dummy variable BUF
Warning: t.f90, line 18: Unused dummy variable BUFFER
[NAG Fortran Compiler normal termination, 2 warnings]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the J3