[J3] Question about "Ambiguous interfaces in generic interface"
Steve Lionel
steve at stevelionel.com
Fri Oct 7 13:43:45 UTC 2022
On 10/7/2022 9:36 AM, Jeff Hammond via J3 wrote:
> I am trying to understand why GCC Fortran (12.2) rejects this code,
> whereas Cray and Intel are happy with it (and NVHPC is too, if I use
> something other than type(*)).
FWIW, NAG Fortran 7.1 is also happy with this code.
D:\Projects>nagfor -c -f2018 t.f90
NAG Fortran Compiler Release 7.1(Hanzomon) Build 7108
Warning: t.f90, line 14: Unused dummy variable BUF
Warning: t.f90, line 18: Unused dummy variable BUFFER
[NAG Fortran Compiler normal termination, 2 warnings]
Steve
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20221007/237f688a/attachment.htm>
More information about the J3
mailing list