[J3] BLOCK construct change

Steidel, Jon L jon.l.steidel at intel.com
Tue Jun 28 21:21:52 UTC 2022

When I took a quick look at this section of the standard, it was also lost on me what this program was in violation of.  There are no constraints on R1109 that appear to be violated.


From: J3 <j3-bounces at mailman.j3-fortran.org> On Behalf Of Steve Lionel via J3
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2022 5:18 PM
To: j3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
Cc: Steve Lionel <steve at stevelionel.com>
Subject: Re: [J3] BLOCK construct change

On 6/28/2022 4:02 PM, Robert Corbett via J3 wrote:
The program

conforms to the Fortran 2008 standard, but it violates syntax
rule R1109 of the Fortran 2018 standard and the Fortran 202X
draft standard.
I may be slow today, but I don't see how it violates the syntax rules. Can you explain?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20220628/bc9d33c8/attachment-0001.htm>

More information about the J3 mailing list