[J3] [EXTERNAL] Re: type definitions

[Steve Lionel]

On 8/11/2022 2:23 PM, Van Snyder via J3 wrote:

> With IMPLICIT NONE it ought definitely to be nonconforming. Does 
> Steve's argument below somehow imply IMPLICIT NONE when an undeclared 
> variable appears in an inquiry function reference?

Anything else, that didn't appear in the example, you want to toss in, Van?

Steve
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20220811/01ccef3d/attachment.htm>