[J3] Why is += missing?

Van Snyder van.snyder at sbcglobal.net
Thu Sep 2 19:43:29 UTC 2021


On Mon, 2021-08-30 at 15:32 -0500, Kurt W Hirchert via J3 wrote:
> Why doesn’t Van want to simply use ASSOCIATE? 


I was quoting the proposal from 03-258r1, long before the
ASSOCIATE construct existed.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20210902/dfe8fb11/attachment.htm>


More information about the J3 mailing list