[J3] [EXTERNAL] Elemental type-bound functions not useful
Clune, Thomas L. (GSFC-6101)
thomas.l.clune at nasa.gov
Mon Mar 29 18:23:24 UTC 2021
Edits are at:
https://j3-fortran.org/doc/year/20/20-114r1.txt
The preceding papers are hopefully correctly identified in the references bit in the header.
From: Van Snyder <van.snyder at sbcglobal.net>
Date: Monday, March 29, 2021 at 1:43 PM
To: "Clune, Thomas L. (GSFC-6101)" <thomas.l.clune at nasa.gov>, j3 <j3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org>, j3 <j3 at j3-fortran.org>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] [J3] Elemental type-bound functions not useful
On Mon, 2021-03-29 at 12:51 +0000, Clune, Thomas L. (GSFC-6101) wrote:
When OO was being developed, there were proposals for CLASSOF and TYPEOF declarations, to specify that some entity had the same class or type as another. Those proposals failed. Could something like that make type-bound elemental functions useful?
The proposals did not fail.
Tell me the page or subclause number where TYPEOF and CLASSOF declarations are described.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20210329/5830f9c5/attachment-0003.htm>
More information about the J3
mailing list