[J3] Slides available for your preview - Part 2 of the Generics Tutorial today at the J3 plenary

[Shterenlikht, Anton]

> On 9 Mar 2021, at 14:02, Clune, Thomas L. (GSFC-6101) <thomas.l.clune at nasa.gov> wrote:
> 
> If I understand correctly,  you are endorsing parameterized modules against other solutions.

Well... not against.
It's just I'm not very clever,
and at least parametrised modules,
as described and discussed at length
in multiple papers and meetings,
are easy enough for me to understand.
That's all.

>From the discussion of generics
in #223, the solutions investigated
by the generics sub-groups will be more complex,
no matter what exact shape they take in the end,
because the sub-group (my impression) wants
a very general solution, addressing as many
use cases as possible, and co-existing with
as many F2018 standard features as possible.

All I'm saying is that I'd favour a more limited
solution, at the expense of rejecting some (minority)
of use cases, if it is simple (as defined by me, of course).

Thank you

Anton