[J3] [EXTERNAL] Holding dates for J3 meeting 225

[Steve Lionel]

The other challenge, of course, is that we don't (at present) have anywhere
to meet F2F.

Steve

On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 1:54 PM Brian Friesen via J3 <
j3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 10:23 AM Clune, Thomas L. (GSFC-6101)
> <thomas.l.clune at nasa.gov> wrote:
> > My hope is that we could delay a commitment either way for F2F for as
> long as is practical.  (Unless there are only a small minority like myself
> that still want F2F at all.)
>
> Understood. The challenge with separating the two questions at hand
> (what format should it be, and what dates should it be) is that the
> split-week format that we did for virtual m223 is not feasible for a
> F2F meeting. There seemed to be consensus that the preferred format
> for a virtual meeting is the split-week format. So picking dates,
> which is the time-sensitive issue, depends somewhat on the chosen
> format of the meeting.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20210305/cb4fe759/attachment.htm>