[J3] Syntax of conditional expressions

Van Snyder van.snyder at sbcglobal.net
Tue Jun 29 22:43:50 UTC 2021

On Tue, 2021-06-29 at 15:29 -0700, Gary Klimowicz via J3 wrote:
> I also agree with you. Taken your arguments to the logical
> conclusion, we should not have this feature at all (which is what I
> would prefer). But if we have to have it, please let's only do one
> syntax for the reasons you posted.
> Yes. I agree. One form, for Anton's reasons and "signal value".
> (Obviously, I strongly prefer a concise one.)

We already looked at requirements and decided to do this.

Why do requirements at all if disagreements over syntax, which in our
process comes AFTER requirements, are allowed to undo agreed

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20210629/b8f41f3b/attachment-0001.htm>

More information about the J3 mailing list