[J3] [EXTERNAL] AW: Syntax of conditional expressions

Steidel, Jon L jon.l.steidel at intel.com
Tue Jun 29 20:49:19 UTC 2021

I again agree with Anton.  Data should pick one.  I would not vote against the feature because of the way it is spelled.  I would vote against the feature because it has two spellings.  

-----Original Message-----
From: J3 <j3-bounces at mailman.j3-fortran.org> On Behalf Of Clune, Thomas L. (GSFC-6101) via J3
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2021 2:48 PM
To: Bader, Reinhold <reinhold.bader at lrz.de>; General J3 interest list <j3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org>
Cc: Clune, Thomas L. (GSFC-6101) <thomas.l.clune at nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: [J3] [EXTERNAL] AW: Syntax of conditional expressions

I agree that if we can get a majority approval with the Data subgroup recommendation, this would be good.    I just don't want to lose the feature over the schism.    

I agree that the tendency to pull-the-rug is somewhat surprising, but there appears to be some sentiments in that direction.

On 6/29/21, 3:44 PM, "Bader, Reinhold" <Reinhold.Bader at lrz.de> wrote:

    Hi Anton, 

    > In fact, I'd urge the DATA subgroup to
    > make that decision, having heard all arguments, and bring the paper for vote with no more straw votes.


    In fact, I am a bit surprised that there is a tendency to simply pull the rug from the feature simply based on syntax non-preferences.


More information about the J3 mailing list