[J3] (SC22WG5.6288) WG5 letter ballot 1 on Fortran 2018 interpretations

[Van Snyder]

On Thu, 2020-09-24 at 19:02 -0400, Steve Lionel via J3 wrote:
> The following Fortran 2018 interpretations are being balloted:
> 
> Yes  No Number   Title
> -Y- --- F18/001  ACOSH principal value specification is wrong
> -Y- --- F18/002  Internal procedures in generic interface blocks
> -Y- --- F18/003  Pointer association of component of non-definable selector
> -Y- --- F18/004  Program execution sequence with failed images
> -Y- --- F18/005  Does INPUT_UNIT really identify the same unit as *?
> -Y- --- F18/006  Connection of INPUT_UNIT on different images
> -Y- --- F18/008  Contradictory assumed-rank requirements
> -Y- --- F18/009  Bad examples in IEEE_ARITHMETIC functions
> -Y- --- F18/010  Categories of pure procedures
> -Y- --- F18/011  Categories of elemental procedures
> -Y- --- F18/012  Internal procedure in a generic interface
> -Y- --- F18/013  TEAM_NUMBER arguments and intrinsic function are ambiguous
> -Y- --- F18/014  Type of OPERATION arguments to the REDUCE intrinsic
> -Y- --- F18/015  Example in C.6.8 is wrong
> -Y- --- F18/016  Host association changes in Fortran 2018
> -Y- --- F18/017  Final subroutine invocation order
> -Y- --- F18/018  Public namelist and private variable
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20200924/26a870f0/attachment.htm>