[J3] (SC22WG5.6288) WG5 letter ballot 1 on Fortran 2018 interpretations

Steidel, Jon L jon.l.steidel at intel.com
Fri Oct 23 17:42:37 EDT 2020

The following Fortran 2018 interpretations are being balloted:

Yes  No Number   Title
-Y- --- F18/001  ACOSH principal value specification is wrong
-Y- --- F18/002  Internal procedures in generic interface blocks
-Y- --- F18/003  Pointer association of component of non-definable selector
-Y- --- F18/004  Program execution sequence with failed images
-Y- --- F18/005  Does INPUT_UNIT really identify the same unit as *?
-Y- --- F18/006  Connection of INPUT_UNIT on different images
-Y- --- F18/008  Contradictory assumed-rank requirements
-Y- --- F18/009  Bad examples in IEEE_ARITHMETIC functions
-Y- --- F18/010  Categories of pure procedures
-Y- --- F18/011  Categories of elemental procedures
-Y- --- F18/012  Internal procedure in a generic interface
-Y- --- F18/013  TEAM_NUMBER arguments and intrinsic function are ambiguous
-Y- --- F18/014  Type of OPERATION arguments to the REDUCE intrinsic
--- -N- F18/015  Example in C.6.8 is wrong
-Y- --- F18/016  Host association changes in Fortran 2018
-Y- --- F18/017  Final subroutine invocation order
-Y- --- F18/018  Public namelist and private variable


F08/015: The example still has flaws, which the HPC subgroup is actively working on.  
                  We should complete this work before passing the interpretation and applying
                   edits that are not correct.

More information about the J3 mailing list