[J3] (SC22WG5.6288) WG5 letter ballot 1 on Fortran 2018 interpretations

[Bill Long]

The following Fortran 2018 interpretations are being balloted:

Yes  No Number   Title
-Y- --- F18/001  ACOSH principal value specification is wrong
-Y- --- F18/002  Internal procedures in generic interface blocks
-Y- --- F18/003  Pointer association of component of non-definable selector
-Y- --- F18/004  Program execution sequence with failed images
-Y- --- F18/005  Does INPUT_UNIT really identify the same unit as *?
-Y- --- F18/006  Connection of INPUT_UNIT on different images
-Y- --- F18/008  Contradictory assumed-rank requirements
-Y- --- F18/009  Bad examples in IEEE_ARITHMETIC functions
-Y- --- F18/010  Categories of pure procedures
-C- --- F18/011  Categories of elemental procedures
-Y- --- F18/012  Internal procedure in a generic interface
-Y- --- F18/013  TEAM_NUMBER arguments and intrinsic function are ambiguous
-Y- --- F18/014  Type of OPERATION arguments to the REDUCE intrinsic
--- -N- F18/015  Example in C.6.8 is wrong
-Y- --- F18/016  Host association changes in Fortran 2018
-Y- --- F18/017  Final subroutine invocation order
-Y- --- F18/018  Public namelist and private variable


Comments:

F08/011: The last paragraph of the answer proposes additional
         improvements in F202X.  Have these been done?  (I do not have
         objections to the general answers to the interp or the
         proposed edits to F18.)


F08/015: Still room for improvement. People have already started
         working on this, and we should allow that process to complete
         before passing changes in this example.



Bill Long                                                                       longb at hpe.com
Engineer/Master , Fortran Technical Support &   voice:  651-605-9024
Bioinformatics Software Development                      fax:  651-605-9143
Hewlett Packard Enterprise/ 2131 Lindau Lane/  Suite 1000/  Bloomington, MN  55425