[J3] sequence type equality
damian at sourceryinstitute.org
Thu Oct 15 01:48:34 EDT 2020
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 1:27 PM Bill Long via J3 <j3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org>
> Relevance: Since the advent of modules 3 decades ago, I’ve never se use
> of, or relevance of SEQUENCE types.
> Mystery: Why is SEQUENCE not in the Obsolescent list?
I'm curious about this too. Currently, obsolescent features are features
for which better methods existed in a previous standard. If a feature has
limited utility, however, it's unlikely that a better method would ever be
developed so we might need to expand how we describe the nature of
Like Bill, I have never seen SEQUENCE in use other than in
compiler documentation or textbooks. I find descriptions online of two use
cases (see http://k2.chem.uh.edu/F95_Reference.pdf):
1. Argument association of equivalent types, and
2. Sequence association in COMMON blocks.
Use case 1 seems similar to EQUIVALENCE, which is obsolescent. Use case 2
is also obsolescent. Unless I'm misreading or "misunderestimating" the
uses, I think there's a strong case to be made for classifying SEQUENCE as
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the J3