[J3] Pure Procedures in 20-007

[Steidel, Jon L]

Sorry, I thought this was WRT Interp 18-007 which HPC has been looking at, not the working draft standard.  My apologies.

-jon

-----Original Message-----
From: J3 <j3-bounces at mailman.j3-fortran.org> On Behalf Of Steidel, Jon L via J3
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2020 4:40 PM
To: General J3 interest list <j3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org>
Cc: Steidel, Jon L <jon.l.steidel at intel.com>
Subject: Re: [J3] Pure Procedures in 20-007

Hi Reuben,

The interp is against Fortran 2018, which uses the term "pure".  Simple procedures are new in F202x.  When the edtis are applied to 202x (the 20-007 in the files for this meeting folder) pure should be changed to simple.  But for edits to correct F2018, the word "pure" should be used.

-jon

-----Original Message-----
From: J3 <j3-bounces at mailman.j3-fortran.org> On Behalf Of Reuben D. Budiardja via J3
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2020 2:11 PM
To: j3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
Cc: Reuben D. Budiardja <reubendb at ornl.gov>
Subject: [J3] Pure Procedures in 20-007

Hi,

In 20-007 on 15.7 Pure Procedures, second bullet says "a pure intrinsic procedure (16.1)"

But 16.1 first para does not have "pure" as one of the eight classes. It has "simple" instead.

Furthermore, in "15.8 Simple procedures", first bullet says "an intrinsic procedure (16.1), if it is specified to be simple"

To be perfectly consistent, should the second bullet on 15.7 Pure Procedure also says the same thing?

I wasn't sure if this would need to be fixed.

Thanks,
Reuben