[J3] (SC22WG5.6165) RE: Impact of coronavirus on WG5 meeting

Bill Long longb at cray.com
Tue Mar 10 21:27:40 UTC 2020



> On Mar 10, 2020, at 3:50 PM, Keith Bierman via J3 <j3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 12:51 PM Gary Klimowicz via J3 <j3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org> wrote:
> I agree with this. It doesn't have to be all-remote-access for it to be more-remote-access.
> 
>  
> 
> Many years back, while I was at Sun some of the Labs folks measured how effective various meeting modalities were in practice.
> 	• In person
> 	• Remote
> 	•  Hybrid (some remote some local)
> Hybrid meetings were least effective (sadly, most common). All remote consistently scored as more effective. In my various roles/organizations since, nothing seems to have changed (viz. the most common modality is Hybrid, which everyone agrees is pessimal). 
> 

We have Hybrid style weekly group meetings at work, since some of the members are in other countries.  When the intent of the meeting is for the manager to transfer information to the troops, it works OK. If the intent is some sort of collaboration that is supposed to get work done, then I agree it is not so great. 

One thing that has changed is that internet access speeds available for remote attendees are a lot better these days. 

> In terms of ANSI/membership rules, if they haven't tweaked them to allow remote participation to count. you might need to formally excuse people who are prohibited from attending in person.

Interesting point. Actually multiple points. 

1) Maintaining membership requires attending meetings.  If the meeting announcement says the meeting is in, for example, Las Vegas, then not being in Las Vegas would seem to indicate “not attending”. 

2) In order to vote on papers, INCITS requires that you have paid your dues (they want the money!).   That would seem to weigh against the idea of “anyone can participate” by accessing the meeting remotely. 

3) New members are supposed to have a trial “observer” meeting. With the current rules, I don’t see a way for that participation to be remote. 

As Van might say, there are a lot of worms in that can. 

Cheers,
Bill



> 
> <image001.png><image002.gif>

Bill Long                                                                       longb at cray.com
Principal Engineer, Fortran Technical Support &   voice:  651-605-9024
Bioinformatics Software Development                      fax:  651-605-9143
Cray, a Hewlett Packard Enterprise company/ 2131 Lindau Lane/  Suite 1000/  Bloomington, MN  55425





More information about the J3 mailing list