[J3] Clarification on F18/017

[Ondřej Čertík]

On Mon, Jun 8, 2020, at 2:54 PM, Steve Lionel via J3 wrote:
> On 6/8/2020 12:31 PM, Ondřej Čertík via J3 wrote:
> > So we discussed it both inside LANL and outside, and at LANL we definitely do not want the CBPA order to be allowed, and it seems a lot of people in the wider community agree.
> 
> In your analysis you explained that due to automatic deallocation 
> predating finalizers, it is natural for some compilers to allow CBPA. 
> 
> Is there any other motivation to allow the CBPA order?
> 
> Looking at the discussion in 
> https://github.com/j3-fortran/fortran_proposals/issues/146, it would 
> appear that "a lot of people in the wider community" resolves to you, 
> Reuben, Peter, and Neil Carlson.

And Zach and Peter B. and several others have expressed that to me privately, but I will not name them unless they want to publicly mention it. I haven't publicized this, but if you have doubts about what the community wants, I am happy to ask more publicly to generate a more representative feedback.

Ondrej