[J3] (SC22WG5.6223) J3 Fortran interp letter ballot #36

[Ondřej Čertík]

Hi,

On Tue, Jun 2, 2020, at 7:13 PM, Malcolm Cohen via J3 wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> 
> Attached is J3 Fortran interp letter ballot #36. This is a 30-day 
> letter (email) ballot, containing four interpretation requests 
> previously passed by a J3 meeting.
> 
> 
> Although this is a formal J3 (PL22.3) ballot, comments/votes from 
> alternates, WG5 members not on J3, and any other interested party, are 
> welcome and will be taken into consideration by J3/Interp.

I want to point attention to F18/017, of which there was a heated debate at the last meeting and I believe people didn't know what they are voting upon. Technically it passed at the last meeting, but many people regretted their vote afterwards.

Here is the relevant issue with further discussion:

https://github.com/j3-fortran/fortran_proposals/issues/146

Before we vote on this, we should all be clear on that example which of the options CABP, CBAP or CBPA are acceptable if this interpretation is accepted. I strongly suggest people wait with their vote until we are absolutely clear on that.

Ondrej