[J3] inconsistency in document dates on wg5 site
Ian Chivers
ian.chivers at chiversandbryan.co.uk
Tue Feb 25 11:52:52 EST 2020
I think that you are probably correct.
Jane and I will list it as a 2011 document, as that
Would be ‘correct’ regarding the WG5 document
Numbering.
From: Steve Lionel [mailto:steve at stevelionel.com]
Sent: 25 February 2020 15:53
To: General J3 interest list
Cc: Ian Chivers
Subject: Re: [J3] inconsistency in document dates on wg5 site
Just the sequence of document numbers confirms that this was originally a 2011 document. This predates my stewardship of the WG5 documents, but as these were just hosted on the NAG FTP site at the time, it would not at all astonish me if someone just updated the file on the server when a newer version became available. John has updated that paper over the years.
Steve
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 7:14 AM Ian Chivers via J3 <j3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org> wrote:
Jane and I are updating our standard conformance tables
And Jane spotted inconsistencies with
N1891The new features of Fortran 2008 (Reid) - supersedes N1828
On the wg5 site this is listed as a 2011 document
But the pdf has
ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG5 N1891
The new features of Fortran 2008
John Reid, JKR Associates, UK
March 13, 2014
Abstract
Any thoughts?
More information about the J3
mailing list