[J3] posts

[Dan Nagle]

Hi,

Well, we have a consensus that generics will be a 202y feature.
And plenary added the papers in 009 by consent.  Further papers
for 009 should also have some level of plenary support.

A worklist?  No.  But it is called a list of candidates,
which seems reasonably accurate.


> On Nov 10, 2019, at 18:10 , Steve Lionel via J3 <j3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org> wrote:
> 
> Vipul asked for 202Y. We haven't even begun plenary discussions of those yet, have we?  I thought 009 was a place to collect ideas for 202Y, not a work list. 
> 
> Steve
> 
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 7:47 PM Dan Nagle via J3 <j3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The other papers had consent of plenary.
> So you need to have the same for yours.
> 
> 
> > On Nov 9, 2019, at 21:33 , Vipul Parekh via J3 <j3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org> wrote:
> > 
> > Dan,
> > 
> > Can you please let me know how I can get this paper to get added to
> > your list (009) for consideration for Fortran 202Y?
> > https://j3-fortran.org/doc/year/19/19-186.txt
> > 
> > Thank you,
> > Vipul Parekh
> > 
> > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 1:37 PM Dan Nagle via J3
> > <j3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org> wrote:
> >> 
> >> Hi,
> >> 
> >> I've gotten the link from RI so I've got the announcement
> >> and agenda posted to the web site.
> >> 
> >> I've also posted an updated 009 of candidate 202y features agreed
> >> in plenary.  The relevant papers are listed.
> >> 
> >> As always, please advise of any blunders.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> --
> >> 
> >> Cheers!
> >> Dan Nagle
> >> 
> >> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> Cheers!
> Dan Nagle
> 
> 


--

Cheers!
Dan Nagle