[J3] posts

Steve Lionel steve at stevelionel.com
Sun Nov 10 20:10:12 EST 2019


Vipul asked for 202Y. We haven't even begun plenary discussions of those
yet, have we?  I thought 009 was a place to collect ideas for 202Y, not a
work list.

Steve

On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 7:47 PM Dan Nagle via J3 <j3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> The other papers had consent of plenary.
> So you need to have the same for yours.
>
>
> > On Nov 9, 2019, at 21:33 , Vipul Parekh via J3 <
> j3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org> wrote:
> >
> > Dan,
> >
> > Can you please let me know how I can get this paper to get added to
> > your list (009) for consideration for Fortran 202Y?
> > https://j3-fortran.org/doc/year/19/19-186.txt
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Vipul Parekh
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 1:37 PM Dan Nagle via J3
> > <j3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I've gotten the link from RI so I've got the announcement
> >> and agenda posted to the web site.
> >>
> >> I've also posted an updated 009 of candidate 202y features agreed
> >> in plenary.  The relevant papers are listed.
> >>
> >> As always, please advise of any blunders.
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Cheers!
> >> Dan Nagle
> >>
> >>
>
>
> --
>
> Cheers!
> Dan Nagle
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20191110/ed5860dc/attachment.html>


More information about the J3 mailing list