[J3] C TS 18661

[Van Snyder]

On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 15:44 -0500, Steve Lionel via J3 wrote:
> Please don't think that I am objecting - I have no position on these new 
> suggestions at this time. I was just pointing out that they would not be 
> "standardizing existing practice".

I pointed out in my original post in this thread that expm1 and logp1
(and sinpi instead of sind, etc) are in the C TS 18661.  I further
pointed out that Fortran appearing to lag behind C for scientific and
engineering applications is not good advertising.