[J3] [EXTERNAL] Re: Second thoughts about F08/003

[Van Snyder]

On Sun, 2019-09-01 at 11:38 +0900, Malcolm Cohen via J3 wrote:
> >F18/003 prohibits changing a pointer component of an object that is a
> >selector that is a function result, by way of an associate name.
>  
> No it doesn’t.
>  
> Perhaps you mean function reference? A pointer function reference is a
> variable and is usually (not always, but usually) definable, so I see
> no problem there either.

I meant result of a function reference, not a function result.
 
> Or are you really talking about F08/003 as per the subject of the
> message? I don’t think so, but... you say F08/003 twice and F18/003
> only once, so I’m not 100% sure... 

I meant F18/003.

It looks like F18/003 does not introduce a problem that will need
another interp to correct it.

> Cheers,
> -- 
> .............................Malcolm.
>