[J3] [EXTERNAL] Re: Changing address of an allocatable on assignment when shapes match

[Malcolm Cohen]

Bill Long conjectures:
> I suspect the real issue is that the original specification in an old standard was not careful about including the list of conditions that require deallocation, and the general scheme was to always deallocate, and then allocate.
This conjecture is mistaken.  There was never ever such a scheme, as it would have been incompatible with Fortran 90/95 as stated in my earlier message.
Cheers,
-- 
...........................Malcolm.
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20190825/e214901f/attachment.html>