[J3] work on F202X at #217?

Van Snyder Van.Snyder at jpl.nasa.gov
Tue Jul 24 13:44:46 EDT 2018


On Tue, 2018-07-24 at 13:00 -0400, Steve Lionel wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:46 PM Van Snyder via J3
> <j3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org> wrote:
> 
>         On Fri, 2018-07-20 at 22:46 +0000, Bill Long via J3 wrote:
>         
>         > 2) The parts of 18-156 that were NOT discussed at Berkeley:
>         > 
>         >       A fairly long list that all got positive votes from
>         J3.  These
>         > are basically the “US proposal”. 
>         
>         A topic at 215 that is not listed in 18-156 was "support for
>         containers."
>         
>         Was this overlooked at 216, voted down while I wasn't looking,
>         quietly pushed off the table by somebody's cat, or folded into
>         something else, say "generics?"
>         
>         
> My notes from 215 say that we considered containers in paper 142 and
> the SV to NOT do containers but instead “add more general capabilities
> that allow implementation of containers by users” was 10/0/0. My cat
> was out of the room at the time.

That was my recollection too.  I carefully wrote "support for
containers" not "do containers."  The "support for containers" topic was
not in 18-156.  So where is this 10/0/0 topic now?

> 
> 
> Steve




More information about the J3 mailing list