[J3] work on F202X at #217?
Van Snyder
Van.Snyder at jpl.nasa.gov
Tue Jul 24 13:44:46 EDT 2018
On Tue, 2018-07-24 at 13:00 -0400, Steve Lionel wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:46 PM Van Snyder via J3
> <j3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2018-07-20 at 22:46 +0000, Bill Long via J3 wrote:
>
> > 2) The parts of 18-156 that were NOT discussed at Berkeley:
> >
> > A fairly long list that all got positive votes from
> J3. These
> > are basically the “US proposal”.
>
> A topic at 215 that is not listed in 18-156 was "support for
> containers."
>
> Was this overlooked at 216, voted down while I wasn't looking,
> quietly pushed off the table by somebody's cat, or folded into
> something else, say "generics?"
>
>
> My notes from 215 say that we considered containers in paper 142 and
> the SV to NOT do containers but instead “add more general capabilities
> that allow implementation of containers by users” was 10/0/0. My cat
> was out of the room at the time.
That was my recollection too. I carefully wrote "support for
containers" not "do containers." The "support for containers" topic was
not in 18-156. So where is this 10/0/0 topic now?
>
>
> Steve
More information about the J3
mailing list