[J3] work on F202X at #217?

[Steve Lionel]

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:46 PM Van Snyder via J3 <
j3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 2018-07-20 at 22:46 +0000, Bill Long via J3 wrote:
>
> > 2) The parts of 18-156 that were NOT discussed at Berkeley:
> >
> >       A fairly long list that all got positive votes from J3.  These
> > are basically the “US proposal”.
>
> A topic at 215 that is not listed in 18-156 was "support for
> containers."
>
> Was this overlooked at 216, voted down while I wasn't looking, quietly
> pushed off the table by somebody's cat, or folded into something else,
> say "generics?"
>
>
> My notes from 215 say that we considered containers in paper 142 and the
SV to NOT do containers but instead “add more general capabilities that
allow implementation of containers by users” was 10/0/0. My cat was out of
the room at the time.

Steve
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20180724/ccab67cf/attachment.html>