(j3.2006) IMPLICIT NONE in BLOCK

[Malcolm Cohen]

No.

 

NOTHING is implicitly type inside a BLOCK construct.  Changing this design principle would be a terrible mistake.

 

Cheers,

-- 

..............Malcolm Cohen, NAG Oxford/Tokyo.

 

From: J3 [mailto:j3-bounces at mailman.j3-fortran.org] On Behalf Of Van Snyder
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 11:23 AM
To: j3 <j3 at j3-fortran.org>
Subject: (j3.2006) IMPLICIT NONE in BLOCK

 

Is it worth contemplating the ramifications of allowing IMPLICIT NONE
(but no other IMPLICIT) in a BLOCK construct? It seems to be useful.


_______________________________________________
J3 mailing list
J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org <mailto:J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org> 
http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3



Disclaimer

The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast Ltd, an innovator in Software as a Service (SaaS) for business.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20180223/5941164c/attachment.html>