(j3.2006) an intrinsic for SORT()

[Van Snyder]

On Tue, 2018-02-06 at 16:24 +0000, Bill Long wrote:
>   So the rationale for the intrinsic is purely one of convenience. 

> And the code is not that hard to write.  It?s unclear if providing an
> intrinsic for this is worthwhile.


>   Certainly as a first pass,  we should look at only a single-image
> sort routine. 

Where's the compelling use case for this?

As a first pass, we should ignore this.  There are many things that are
more important and that can't be done with already-existing library
routines.  Let's not waste our time re-inventing the wheel.