[J3] 18-156

[Van Snyder]

On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 21:56 -0800, Damian Rouson wrote:
> I could be dissuaded form supporting units if the cost is higher than
> the two major feature sets that clearly have the broadest community
> support (generic programming and better error-handling) or if the
> performance cost of units is substantial, but I can only come to these
> conclusions if we can at least discuss the proposal without dismissing
> it at the very beginning of our deliberative process for 202X.

What's really frustrating is that the present proposal is for a
non-binding TS without any promise it will ever be integrated into any
future standard.  In this form it is entirely irrelevant to F202x.