[J3] (j3.2006) IMPLICIT NONE in BLOCK

[Robert Corbett]

The standard does not provide interpretations for non-conforming programs.  It does, however, require conforming processors to be able to issue a diagnostic message if a program violates a constraint.  The processors in question might or might not have implemented that capability for the example program.

Robert Corbett

> On Feb 26, 2018, at 6:07 AM, Clune, Thomas L. (GSFC-6101) via J3 <j3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org> wrote:
> 
> 
>>> On Feb 26, 2018, at 3:33 AM, Anton Shterenlikht via J3 <j3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> From: Van Snyder <van.snyder at jpl.nasa.gov>
>>> 
>>> OK, I found note 8.45 on page 123 of 18-007.  It explicitly says the
>>> program is not conformant, as I suspected.  So whichever processors Jon
>>> and Bill used might need repair.
>> 
>> Why?
>> Processors can do whatever they want with non-conforming programs, right?
> 
> I for one would be in favor of adding a constraint that processors are not permitted to start WWIII with non-conforming programs.
> 
> (Sorry, not enough sleep to suppress the urge to hit the send button on this.)
> 
> - Tom
> 
> 
>> 
>> Anton
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> J3 mailing list
>> J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
>> http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3_mailman.j3-fortran.org
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> J3 mailing list
> J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
> http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3_mailman.j3-fortran.org