(j3.2006) Label DO statement
Wed Mar 29 07:50:35 EDT 2017
B.3.10 of 17-007r1 [546:10-12]. Says
"The label in the DO statement is redundant with the construct name.
Furthermore, the label allows unrestricted branches and, for its main
purpose (the target of a conditional branch to skip the rest of the
current iteration), is redundant with the CYCLE statement, which is
With the deletion of the nonblock DO, is it still correct to say that
the label allows unrestricted branches? [191:37] says "It is permissible
to branch to an end-do only from within its DO construct."
More information about the J3