(j3.2006) LEN type parameter
Bill Long
longb
Mon Dec 18 18:37:51 EST 2017
> On Dec 18, 2017, at 5:28 PM, Van Snyder <Van.Snyder at jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 23:23 +0000, Bill Long wrote:
>> Interesting test with very inconsistent compiler behavior:
>>
>> program t03
>> type badtype (p5)
>> integer, len :: p5
>> real (kind=p5) :: x ! X decl line
>> integer :: y=p5 ! Y decl line
>> end type badtype
>> end
>>
>> Compiler 1: Error for both X and Y lines
>> Compiler 2: No errors
>> Compiler 3: Error for Y line only
>> Compiler 4: (Evidently does not support pdt yet. Every line that includes ?p5? got an error.)
>>
>> It reduces to whether a LEN type parameter is a constant expression.
>> Does not seem to be reasonable to me that it would be.
>
> We should clarify what we want. Maybe the type definition is OK, but
> you can't declare any objects of the type with a specification
> expression for the value of the type parameter.
>
Or specifying the value as deferred in the object declaration. But if you have those limitations, why not just declare p5 to be a KIND type parameter up front? You would not be taking any advantage of the special capabilities of a LEN parameter.
Cheers,
Bill
>> Cheers,
>> Bill
>>
>> Bill Long longb at cray.com
>> Principal Engineer, Fortran Technical Support & voice: 651-605-9024
>> Bioinformatics Software Development fax: 651-605-9143
>> Cray Inc./ 2131 Lindau Lane/ Suite 1000/ Bloomington, MN 55425
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> J3 mailing list
>> J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
>> http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> J3 mailing list
> J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
> http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3
Bill Long longb at cray.com
Principal Engineer, Fortran Technical Support & voice: 651-605-9024
Bioinformatics Software Development fax: 651-605-9143
Cray Inc./ 2131 Lindau Lane/ Suite 1000/ Bloomington, MN 55425
More information about the J3
mailing list