(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5943) AW: draft comments for CD
Tue Aug 22 02:55:38 EDT 2017
thanks for the feedback. Further comments inline.
> -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: owner-sc22wg5 at open-std.org [mailto:owner-sc22wg5 at open-std.org]
> Im Auftrag von John Reid
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. August 2017 00:15
> An: WG5 <sc22wg5 at open-std.org>
> Betreff: (SC22WG5.5942) (j3.2006) draft comments for CD
> Bader, Reinhold wrote:
> > Dear WG5/J3,
> > attached please find my draft contribution for the comments from
> Here are my (personal) comments on your comments.
> 40:17. I think the present text is OK. An image can have an execution state of
OK - I've deleted this comment.
> 45:22. An image can be a member of more than one established team, so the
> new words would be better as ?of a team in which it is established (5.4.8)?.
I've made this change.
> 105:29-30. I think the present text is OK. An assumed-rank entity is just that.
> It is not an array.
Unfortunately, the object has the DIMENSION attribute, and an assumed-rank-spec is
a variant of array-spec. I've modified the suggested change to read:
[105:29-30] Delete C831
[104:14+] Insert reworded constraint C829+
?A named object with the DIMENSION attribute that has the POINTER or ALLOCATABLE attribute shall have an array-spec that is a deferred-shape-spec-list or an assumed-rank-spec.?
> 124. For the edit, don't you need "of a derived type defined in the module"?
> 188. I think the definitive text needs to be clearer on this point.
Maybe, but Bill hasn't commented on the relevant thread yet, so this might become homework for J3.
> 500:22-23. In the edit, change "subscripts[n-1]" to "subscript[n-1]".
The parameter has the name "subscripts", so I think my edit is OK.
> 562:32. Comment to come.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 7773 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20170822/5406f062/attachment.bin
More information about the J3