(j3.2006) Redundant specs

Steve Lionel steve
Wed Aug 16 11:03:24 EDT 2017

It's not that I think LOCAL(X),LOCAL(Y) is redundant, but it feels strange
to have two LOCAL specs in the same concurrent-locality. No problem if we
want to allow that.

I will write a paper for the IMPLICIT issue.


On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 6:34 AM, Malcolm Cohen <malcolm at nag-j.co.jp> wrote:

> >R1129 (concurrent-locality)? Is one allowed to have LOCAL(X),LOCAL(Y)?
> Someone has a very strange idea of "redundant" if they think that is
> redundant.
> Cheers,
> --
> ................................Malcolm.
> _______________________________________________
> J3 mailing list
> J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
> http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20170816/faecb81b/attachment-0001.html 

More information about the J3 mailing list