(j3.2006) Redundant specs
Wed Aug 16 11:03:24 EDT 2017
It's not that I think LOCAL(X),LOCAL(Y) is redundant, but it feels strange
to have two LOCAL specs in the same concurrent-locality. No problem if we
want to allow that.
I will write a paper for the IMPLICIT issue.
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 6:34 AM, Malcolm Cohen <malcolm at nag-j.co.jp> wrote:
> >R1129 (concurrent-locality)? Is one allowed to have LOCAL(X),LOCAL(Y)?
> Someone has a very strange idea of "redundant" if they think that is
> J3 mailing list
> J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the J3