(j3.2006) CD ballot process
Menard, Lorri
lorri.menard
Wed Apr 12 12:48:02 EDT 2017
I vote "Yes" with the 4 comments below and disagree with "Delete locality specifications for DO CONCURRENT construct; see 17-144."
Comments:
US
P 188
L 7-9
11.1.5.2
1
TE
Redefinition of active team variable provides no useable functionality, introduces runtime overhead, and allows undefined behaviour.
Prohibit redefinition of an active team variable.
Discussion and edits in paper J3/17-146.
US
P 188
L 20
11.1.5.2
5
TE
Unclear specification of CHANGE TEAM semantics
Discussion and examples in paper J3/17-148.
US
P448 L18
17.2
2
ED
IEEE_MODES_TYPE is defined in module IEEE_EXCEPTIONS, not IEEE_ARITHMETIC.
Move to paragraph 3.
Edits in paper J3/17-145.
US
P483
L19
18.2.1
1
ED
There are references to Table 15.1 and Table 15.2. These should be Table 18.1 and Table 18.2.
Change table references to 18.1 and 18.2 respectively.
Edits in paper J3/17-147.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20170412/0f06c183/attachment.html
More information about the J3
mailing list