(j3.2006) CD ballot process

Menard, Lorri lorri.menard
Wed Apr 12 12:48:02 EDT 2017


I vote "Yes" with the 4 comments below and disagree with "Delete locality specifications for DO CONCURRENT construct; see 17-144."



Comments:



US


P 188

L 7-9


11.1.5.2


1


TE


Redefinition of active team variable provides no useable functionality, introduces runtime overhead, and allows undefined behaviour.


Prohibit redefinition of an active team variable.

Discussion and edits in paper J3/17-146.





US


P 188

L 20


11.1.5.2


5


TE


Unclear specification of CHANGE TEAM semantics


Discussion and examples in paper J3/17-148.





US


P448 L18


17.2


2


ED


IEEE_MODES_TYPE is defined in  module IEEE_EXCEPTIONS, not IEEE_ARITHMETIC.


Move to paragraph 3.

Edits in paper J3/17-145.





US


P483

L19


18.2.1


1


ED


There are references to Table 15.1 and Table 15.2.  These should be Table 18.1 and Table 18.2.


Change table references to 18.1 and 18.2 respectively.

Edits in paper J3/17-147.





-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20170412/0f06c183/attachment.html 



More information about the J3 mailing list