(j3.2006) CD ballot process

[John Reid]

erik at forcheck.nl wrote:
>
> Subclause 11.10.4 should be: 11.1.10.4.

OK. I would be happy to propose these edits, too, in the UK vote. Or do 
you have a way to get your comments into a vote from the Netherlands?

Best wishes,

John.

>
> Thanks,
> Erik
>
>> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>> Van: j3-bounces at mailman.j3-fortran.org [mailto:j3-bounces at mailman.j3-
>> fortran.org] Namens John Reid
>> Verzonden: dinsdag 11 april 2017 13:56
>> Aan: fortran standards email list for J3 <j3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org>
>> Onderwerp: Re: (j3.2006) CD ballot process
>>
>>
>>
>> erik at forcheck.nl wrote:
>>> I approve the CD with the attached comments.
>>>
>>
>> There is no subclause 11.10.4.
>>
>> The edit for 16.9.55 has been noted by the UK.
>>
>> The edit for 16.9.77 is not needed. 16.2.1, para 3  says "The dummy
>> arguments of the intrinsic procedures in 16.9 have INTENT (IN) if the
> intent is
>> not stated explicitly."
>>
>> I would be happy to propose your edits 1 and 7 in the UK vote.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>>
>> John.
>> _______________________________________________
>> J3 mailing list
>> J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
>> http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> J3 mailing list
>> J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
>> http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3