On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 10:07 +0900, Cohen Malcolm wrote: > I don?t think much of the reasons for DPROD?s continuing utility > though: If you can find somebody willing to replace it with x*dble(y) or dble(x)*y or dble(x)*dble(y), at many places in billions of lines of legacy code, for free, go ahead and delete it.