(j3.2006) EX editing
John Reid
John.Reid
Thu Apr 6 07:00:39 EDT 2017
Bill Long wrote:
> I recall there was an edit before to fix a missing 0X in the Note. Because it conflicted with 13.7.2.3.2p7
>
> " ? An input field that is a hexadecimal-significand number consists of an optional sign, followed by the hexadecimal indicator which is the digit 0 immediately followed by the letter X, followed by a hexadecimal significand followed by a hexadecimal exponent.?
>
> on the grounds that what you output with EX should be readable with EX. But the output form at 13.7.2.3.6p5 does look wrong.
I have proposed the edit for the UK vote.
I am also suggesting
[278:20] At the end of the third bullet, add "x_0 has the value 1 unless
the internal value is zero." and
[278:6+] In the final value in NOTE 13.14, change "3" to "4".
Cheers,
John.
>
> Cheers,
> Bill
>
>
> On Apr 5, 2017, at 2:47 PM, John Reid <John.Reid at stfc.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think there is a mistake in 13.7.2.3.6 EX editing (page 278). The IEEE
>> standard requires the "hexIndicator" 0X to appear before the first digit
>> and it does in NOTE 13.14, but it is not mentioned in the text. I
>> suggest the edit
>> [278:15] Before "x_0" add "0X".
>>
>> Is it intended that x_0 be a binary digit? NOTE 13.14 suggests that this
>> is so. Should we say so? If not, is it processor dependent? Perhaps the
>> output in the second example of NOTE 13.14 should be -0XF.A000P+000
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> John.
>> _______________________________________________
>> J3 mailing list
>> J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
>> http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3
>
> Bill Long longb at cray.com
> Principal Engineer, Fortran Technical Support & voice: 651-605-9024
> Bioinformatics Software Development fax: 651-605-9143
> Cray Inc./ 2131 Lindau Lane/ Suite 1000/ Bloomington, MN 55425
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> J3 mailing list
> J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
> http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3
>
More information about the J3
mailing list