(j3.2006) EX editing

[Steve Lionel]

I think you're right - how did we miss this?

Steve

On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 3:47 PM, John Reid <John.Reid at stfc.ac.uk> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I think there is a mistake in 13.7.2.3.6 EX editing (page 278). The IEEE
> standard requires the "hexIndicator" 0X to appear before the first digit
> and it does in NOTE 13.14, but it is not mentioned in the text. I
> suggest the edit
> [278:15] Before "x_0" add "0X".
>
> Is it intended that x_0 be a binary digit? NOTE 13.14 suggests that this
> is so. Should we say so? If not, is it processor dependent? Perhaps the
> output in the second example of NOTE 13.14 should be -0XF.A000P+000
>
> Cheers,
>
> John.
> _______________________________________________
> J3 mailing list
> J3 at mailman.j3-fortran.org
> http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3
>



-- 
.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20170405/43eea4f7/attachment.html