(j3.2006) Is really necessary?

Van Snyder Van.Snyder
Tue May 10 14:48:30 EDT 2016

On Tue, 2016-05-10 at 09:01 -0400, Tom Clune wrote:
> I would respond to Van, though, that in a perfect world, this is
> probably a better case for a templates than a change to the rules for
> polymorphism.

It's not like something equivalent to templates hasn't been requested.

I keep running to problems, and I keep proposing solutions, and too
frequently the reply is "Why would you want to do that?"

More information about the J3 mailing list