(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5757) RE: Units of measure - 5th draft

Whitlock, Stan stan.whitlock
Wed Jul 6 16:43:08 EDT 2016

Hi, John - I like the attached draft.  I think this should be the final draft since all comments have been addressed, some far too many times.

Thanks for your efforts				/Stan

-----Original Message-----
From: j3-bounces at mailman.j3-fortran.org [mailto:j3-bounces at mailman.j3-fortran.org] On Behalf Of John Reid
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2016 1:49 PM
To: WG5 <sc22wg5 at open-std.org>
Subject: (j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5756) Units of measure

David Muxworthy wrote:
>> there is nothing in the minutes re altering the objectives of a TS. My recollection is that there was no enthusiasm for the idea,
> I accept that decision, but I have no recollection of it being made (Delft or London?).

Delft. In one of my emails, I said London. Sorry about that.
>> I would like to complete this within a week, i.e., by 12 July. If you are one of those that voted against the proposal and think that the current draft does not represent your view accurately, please suggest changes before 12 July.
> It would add weight to the penultimate paragraph to say that there was also a country vote in Delft which went 0 - 3 - 3.

Done. Here is a new version.

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: N2112-5.txt
Url: http://mailman.j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20160706/a9afc9fd/attachment.txt 

More information about the J3 mailing list