(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5746) Units of measure

Van Snyder van.snyder
Mon Jul 4 14:51:44 EDT 2016

On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 14:46 +0000, Bill Long wrote:
> There are scores of features that have been proposed in the past and
> rejected.  Unless they meaningfully address something that has since
> changed in the computing landscape, the argument for rejecting them
> will not have changed.  we should resolve to not reconsider such
> features yet again.

Many of the features proposed in 2004 that didn't make the cut for 2008
were not "rejected."  They were actually favorably received.  There were
simply higher-priority things to be done.  The ones that were favorably
received ought to continue to be candidates.

More information about the J3 mailing list