(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5660) [ukfortran] Straw ballot on second draft corrigendum4

[Cohen Malcolm]

This would be a technical change to the result of interpretation F08/0142. 
I do not think we can do that at this time.

Cheers,

-----Original Message----- 
From: erik at forcheck.nl
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 9:38 PM
To: 'WG5'
Subject: [ukfortran] (SC22WG5.5657) Straw ballot on second draft 
corrigendum4

>Please answer the following question "Is N2095, with the references and
>notes removed, acceptable for submission to SC22 for publication as
>Corrigendum 4 for Fortran 2008?" in one of these ways.
>
>1) Yes.
>2) Yes, but I recommend the following changes.

Yes, but I recommend the following changes.

>3) No, for the following reasons.
>4) Abstain.

CHANGES:
Subclause 11.2.3
In constraint C1113, after "shall be the name of a nonintrinsic module" 
insert "that declares a separate module procedure".
Change to:
In constraint C1113, after "shall be the name of a nonintrinsic module" 
insert "that declares a separate module procedure of which the separate 
module procedure is not present".

Reason: If the implementation of the separate module procedure is in the 
module there is also no need for a submodule.

Erik Kruyt
Forcheck b.v.



_______________________________________________
ukfortran mailing list
http://lists.accu.org/mailman/listinfo/ukfortran

-- 
........................Malcolm Cohen, Nihon NAG, Tokyo.