(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.5646) [ukfortran] Another comment on Corrigendum 4
Sun Jan 24 01:22:01 EST 2016
These exchanges are quite valuable to avoid spending valuable time at
meetings on things we can resolve beforehand.
On Sun, 2016-01-24 at 15:17 +0900, Malcolm Cohen wrote:
> Flogging a dead horse here, but...
> >> (2) "potential subobject component" applies to objects as well as types.
> >> Just look at the definition - no limitation to types is implied inferred
> >> or
> >> stated. Objects as well as types have components, and thus have
> >> potential
> >> subobject components.
> >I thought 4.5.1p5 was the definition. Is the summary of it in 126.96.36.199
> >the complete and correct definition?
> Obviously the answer to the question "are the definitions in 1.3 mere
> summaries or actual definitions" is "they are the actual definitions, as
> stated, and as required by ISO".
> But even if we ignore that, the 4.5.1p5 citation has strangely overlooked
> 4.5.1p6, the very next paragraph which states
> "The components, direct components, potential subobject components, and
> ultimate components of an object of derived type are the components, direct
> components, potential subobject components, and ultimate components of its
> type, respectively."
> So we have even dotted the eyes and crossed the tees.
More information about the J3